Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via PolyGram) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Trade this market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Trade this market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Trade this market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Trade this market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Trade this market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| O/U 1.5 | 100% |
| O/U 2.5 | 100% |
| O/U 3.5 | 100% |
| O/U 4.5 | 100% |
| Both Teams to Score | 100% |
| Both Teams to Score in First Half | 100% |
| 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 100% |
| Bucheon FC 1995 O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| Bucheon FC 1995 O/U 1.5 | 100% |
| FC Anyang O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| FC Anyang O/U 1.5 | 100% |
| FC Anyang O/U 2.5 | 100% |
| Bucheon FC 1995 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| FC Anyang 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| Both Teams to Score in Second Half | 100% |
| 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 100% |
| 2nd Half O/U 2.5 | 100% |
| Bucheon FC 1995 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| FC Anyang 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| FC Anyang 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 100% |
| Bucheon FC 1995 (-1.5) | 0% |
| FC Anyang (-1.5) | 0% |
| Bucheon FC 1995 (-2.5) | 0% |
| FC Anyang (-2.5) | 0% |
| O/U 5.5 | 0% |
| 1st Half O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| Bucheon FC 1995 O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| Bucheon FC 1995 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| FC Anyang 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| Bucheon FC 1995 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
Market context
Polymarket is pricing the contract at **0% YES** for additional markets on the Bucheon FC 1995 v FC Anyang K-League match, which means conditional tokens tied to this outcome are currently being treated as effectively worthless on the market.[1] The real-world fixture is scheduled for 22 July at 6:30 AM ET, so the settlement window runs on the same match timetable rather than on a long-dated season narrative.[1]
For context, this is a local derby with a long, fairly balanced history, but not a dominant one-sided series: in 48 previous meetings, Bucheon have won 13, Anyang 20, and 15 have finished level.[2] For a Polymarket user, that kind of head-to-head record matters mainly as background, because “more markets” contracts usually hinge on whether the event platform keeps the market scope open for extra in-play or pre-match lines, not on who is more likely to win the football match itself.[1][2]
The key catalysts are operational rather than tactical: official match scheduling, any late competition or broadcast adjustments, and whether Polymarket keeps the market category active long enough for new conditional markets to be created and resolved against the match on Polygon in USDC.[1] The practical watch-point is the exchange’s own market structure around kickoff; if no new contract is spun up before settlement, the current 0% read will tend to persist because there is nothing left for the oracle to resolve.[1]
Methodology
We track Bucheon FC 1995 vs. FC Anyang - More Markets across the five venues with material prediction-market liquidity. The probability shown is the live Polymarket mid; the comparison rows summarise how each venue treats the underlying contract — fees, KYC thresholds, settlement currency, deposit options. The highlighted row marks the cheapest route into Polymarket's order book.
Resolution & payout
Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.
Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is PolyGram. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
Trade Bucheon FC 1995 vs. FC Anyang - More Markets on PolyGram
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →