New England Revolution vs. Toronto FC - More Markets

Platform comparison

Market context

New England Revolution v Toronto FC is the kind of MLS fixture where Polymarket’s **0% YES** price on the “more markets” contract says more about what has been resolved in the market than about the football itself: the contract settles from the game’s add-on outcomes, and traders on Polygon are buying or selling conditional tokens with USDC rather than betting the match in a simple win/lose sense. With the settlement window now past, the current price reflects the market’s view that no qualifying “more markets” condition was met by kick-off or during the defined window, so the contract is effectively pricing a completed outcome rather than an open contest.

For context, this pairing has recently produced a low-scoring, evenly balanced result: the clubs drew 1-1 at Gillette Stadium in September 2025, with both sides scoring in the second half. Comparable MLS meetings between teams with similar attacking profiles often hinge on marginal state changes — team news, late lineup shifts, and whether the match state turns open after the first goal — because those are the moments that move derivative markets more than the headline result itself.

A trader watching the last run-up would have focused on official starting line-ups, any late injury or suspension updates, and whether either club was managing minutes around a congested schedule, since those factors affect the live probability of additional goals and other side markets. Public preview pricing on the match also showed a fairly tight total, with the combined score line set at 2.5 and the total shaded to the under, which is consistent with why the “more markets” contract could stay pinned at the floor unless a specific trigger was reached.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3

Methodology

We track New England Revolution vs. Toronto FC - More Markets across the five venues with material prediction-market liquidity. The probability shown is the live Polymarket mid; the comparison rows summarise how each venue treats the underlying contract — fees, KYC thresholds, settlement currency, deposit options. The highlighted row marks the cheapest route into Polymarket's order book.

Resolution & payout

At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.

On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is PolyGram. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does Polymarket cost to trade?

Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.